Tracking Integration With Yocto/OpenEmbedded

Posted on 16/04/2016 by dariusz.cieslak

715Yocto is an Open Source project (based, in turn, on OpenEmbedded and bitbake) that allows you to create your own custom Linux distribution and build everything from sources (like Gentoo does).

It's mostly used for embedded software development and has support from many hardware vendors. Having source build in place allows you to customize almost everything.

In recent years I was faced with problem of development integration – to allow distributed development teams to cooperate and to supply their updates effectively for central build system(s). The purpose of this process:

  • to know if the build is successful after each delivery
  • to have high resolution of builds (to allow regression tests)
  • and (of course) to launch automated tests after each build

Continue reading →

Posted in en | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

ssls.com review

Posted on 12/03/2016 by dariusz.cieslak

Sometimes you need to provide encrypted traffic to your site. Besides proper configuration in web server you need to authenticate your server using some publicly trusted certificates, so your customer's browser won't show warnings about untrusted site.

One of the cheapest SSL certificate solution is ssls.com. Let's check their price for 3 year lease:

694I used to pay $10 per year in the past for ComodoSSL certificates, this offer seems to cut the usual price in half. Sounds unrealistic? Let's check it!

Continue reading →

Posted in en | Tagged | Leave a comment

Basic Hudson/Jenkins tutorial

Posted on 23/01/2016 by dariusz.cieslak

hudson-bustContinuous Integration is a great thing. Allows you to monitor your project state on a commit-by-commit basis. Every build failure is monitored easily.

If you connect your unit and integration tests properly also tell your runtime properties of the project, for example:

  • Does it boot properly?
  • Doesn't it crash in 1st 5 minutes?
  • Are all unit tests 100% green?
  • Are all static tests (think: FindBugs, lclint, pylint, …) free of selected defect types?

The implementation:

  • you encourage your team to push changes frequently to main development branch (having high quality unit testing suite you can even skip topic branches policy)
  • you setup some kind of Continuous Integration tool to scan all the repositories and detect new changes automatically
  • for each such change new build is started and tests are carries out automatically
  • all the build artefacts (including tests outcomes) are collected
  • the teams are notified by e-mail about build/test failures in order to allow them to carry out fixes quickly

OK, so we have outlined the plan above. Let's dig into details for every step. I'll use the most popular tool used named Hudson/Jenkins as implementation tool (there are two projects, but they're, actually, the same tool).

I'm going to address all the features I expect from continuous integration system (based on my current experience with other CI systems).

Continue reading →

Posted in en | Leave a comment

CMake very basic tutorial

Posted on 22/01/2016 by dariusz.cieslak

slider-cmakeWriting Makefiles is a complicated process. They are powerful tools and, as such, show quite high level of complexity. In order to make typical project development easier higher level tools have been raised. One of such tools is CMake. Think of CMake for Make as C/C++ compiler for assembly language.

CMake transforms project description saved in CMakeLists.txt file into classical Makefile that could be run by make tool. You write your project description in a high level notation, allowing CMake to take care of the details.

cmake_workflow Continue reading →

Posted in en | Tagged , | Leave a comment

An Easy Executable Software Specification – A Proposal

Posted on 10/01/2016 by dariusz.cieslak

Executable Specification 1Executable specification is a "holly graal" of modern software engineering. It's very hard to implement as it requires:

  • Formal specification of rules
  • Transformation of those rules into real-system predicates
  • Stimulating system under tests state changes in repeatable manner

FitNesse is one of such approaches that specifies function sample inputs and outputs then allow to run such test cases using special connectors and provide colour reports from test runs. It's easy to use (from specification point of view), but has the following drawbacks:

  • Software architecture must be compatible with unit testing (what is very good in general: cut unnecessary dependencies, Inverse of Control, …) – your current system might require heavy refactoring to reach such state
  • Rules are written and evaluated only during single test execution – different scenario requires another test case (no Design By Contract style continuous state validation)

Above features are present in any other unit test framework: JUnit, unittest, … All such testing changes state and checks output.

Continue reading →

Posted in en | Leave a comment